Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics

نویسنده

  • Bart Geurts
چکیده

The Gricean theory of conversational implicature has always been plagued by data suggesting that what would seem to be conversational inferences may occur within the scope of operators like believe, for example; which for bona fide implicatures should be an impossibility. Concentrating my attention on scalar implicatures, I argue that, for the most part, such observations can be accounted for within a Gricean framework, and without resorting to local pragmatic inferences of any kind. However, there remains a small class of marked cases that cannot be treated as conversational implicatures, and they do require a local mode of pragmatic interpretation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Conditional antecedents provide no evidence for a grammatical theory of scalar implicature

Recent work in formal pragmatics has devoted much attention to the question of whether scalar implicatures are generated by conversational reasoning or by grammatical devices. The former approach has been dominant for some time, due in large measure to the work of Grice (1975, 1989). However, there has been a recent flourishing of grammatically-oriented alternatives in which scalar implicatures...

متن کامل

From Meaning to Inference: Evidence for the distinction between lexical semantics and scalar implicature in online processing and development

Acknowledgments – This work benefited from conversations with members of the Cambridge Conference on Experimental Pragmatics, Lab for Developmental Studies, and the MIT-Harvard number reading group. We are grateful to Ayo Adigun and Hila Katz for their assistance in testing and data coding.

متن کامل

Informativeness, Relevance and Scalar Implicature

1. Introduction The main topic of this paper is the phenomenon of scalar implicature. Typical examples are given in (1)-(4): (1) a. Bill has got some of Chomsky's papers. b. The speaker believes that Bill hasn't got all of Chomsky's papers. (2) a. There will be five of us for dinner tonight. b. There won't be more than five of us for dinner tonight. (3) a. X: I like Mary. She's intelligent and ...

متن کامل

Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface.

Scalar implicature has served as a test case for exploring the relations between semantic and pragmatic processes during language comprehension. Most studies have used reaction time methods and the results have been variable. In these studies, we use the visual-world paradigm to investigate implicature. We recorded participants' eye movements during commands like "Point to the girl that has som...

متن کامل

On-line Interpretation of Scalar Quantifiers: Insight into the Semantic-Pragmatics Interface

The relationship between semantic and pragmatic interpretation has been a perennial puzzle in psycholinguistics. General agreement about the existence of these levels of interpretation contrasts with controversy in the field over exact boundaries between these representations and their relationship in real-time processing. Past research has demonstrated that pragmatic processing is rapid, often...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007